Details Books In Pursuance Of A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears
| Original Title: | A barrel of laughs, a vale of tears. |
| ISBN: | 0062059262 (ISBN13: 9780062059260) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Jules Feiffer
Paperback | Pages: 192 pages Rating: 4.32 | 790 Users | 99 Reviews
Specify Regarding Books A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears
| Title | : | A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears |
| Author | : | Jules Feiffer |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 192 pages |
| Published | : | March 7th 1998 by HarperCollins (first published September 1st 1995) |
| Categories | : | Fantasy. Humor. Fiction. Young Adult. Childrens. Middle Grade |
Rendition To Books A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears
Fondly known to my friends and me as the "Roger Book," this book has quickly become a favorite not only with me, but also with my friends, my family and my sixth grade students. It follows Prince Roger through his quest to find he doesn't know what, he doesn't know where, and he'll only know he has found it when neither of them are laughing. However, even if Roger is not laughing, the reader definitely will be. This book is a delightfully engaging story which works amazingly well as a read-aloud. When used in the classroom, it provides wonderful opportunities for discussing various elements of story, plot, and figurative language, as well as providing discussion about friendship, love, and life.Rating Regarding Books A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears
Ratings: 4.32 From 790 Users | 99 ReviewsPiece Regarding Books A Barrel of Laughs, a Vale of Tears
Well, that's done.This is a children's chapter book with a lot of fun illustrations. BUT... This fairytale should have been given to kids a couple centuries ago. I can't imagine reading it to my boys back in the 1970's without surrounding it with a lot of plays of the video or album of Free to be You and Me. It is male heavy with the females in lowly roles of being rescued and put in their places as wives and mothers. So, I wouldn't have read it to my daughter in the 1980's. As adults, I mightMeh. We listened to 2/3 of the audiobook and gave up. Too much laughing in the story and not enough by us. It also had a convoluted, slow plot. In other words, BORING!!! Sorry to those who loved it.
I enjoyed reading this book and found the line illustrations illustrative 🐴 Okay. The cartoons emphasized what need to be emphasized and movement was well conveyed every time. This is unusual for most other illustrators and very often well done by Feiffer and well done here. I feel better about that description. Btw, did you catch that? Feiffer engages in metaliterature and that I have engaged in a bit of metacritique.Becoming a bit more serious now. Feiffer engages in metaliterature, talking so
I reread this book, and then realized that I've never once put it on Goodreads. Silly Keels. Anyway, it was delightful as always. Doesn't take itself seriously in the slightest, which is what makes it such a great read to begin with. I always loved the idea of fantasy tales, but have never really gotten addicted to high fantasy like most. Sure, I like specific renditions such as Tolkein's, Edding's, and the like, but the overly serious sorts with the thousands of names and races and
Delightfully farcical and cleverly contrived, I found the absurdities of each character and plot twist to layer richness and depth to this wonderful tale. Things such as King Whatchamacallit's jumbled phraseology are thoroughly enjoyable, but the author was wise in keeping it limited to sparing doses. The simple means used to escape the Forever Forest that no one would ever expect is another example of the creativity of the author.
Well, that's done.This is a children's chapter book with a lot of fun illustrations. BUT... This fairytale should have been given to kids a couple centuries ago. I can't imagine reading it to my boys back in the 1970's without surrounding it with a lot of plays of the video or album of Free to be You and Me. It is male heavy with the females in lowly roles of being rescued and put in their places as wives and mothers. So, I wouldn't have read it to my daughter in the 1980's. As adults, I might
0 Comments