Point Books Toward The Double Helix
| Original Title: | The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA |
| ISBN: | 0451037707 (ISBN13: 9780451037701) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | National Book Award Finalist for The Sciences (1969) |
James D. Watson
Paperback | Pages: 143 pages Rating: 3.86 | 15491 Users | 799 Reviews
Specify Based On Books The Double Helix
| Title | : | The Double Helix |
| Author | : | James D. Watson |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 143 pages |
| Published | : | February 1st 1969 by Signet Books (first published 1968) |
| Categories | : | Science. Nonfiction. Biology. History. Biography. Autobiography. Memoir. Popular Science |
Chronicle Concering Books The Double Helix
By identifying the structure of DNA, the molecule of life, Francis Crick and James Watson revolutionized biochemistry & won themselves a Nobel Prize. At the time, Watson was only 24, a young scientist hungry to make his mark. His uncompromisingly honest account of the heady days of their thrilling sprint against other world-class researchers to solve one of science's greatest mysteries gives a dazzlingly clear picture of a world of brilliant scientists with great gifts, very human ambitions & bitter rivalries. With humility unspoiled by false modesty, Watson relates his & Crick's desperate efforts to beat Linus Pauling to the Holy Grail of life sciences, the identification of the basic building block of life. Never has a scientist been so truthful in capturing in words the flavor of his work.Rating Based On Books The Double Helix
Ratings: 3.86 From 15491 Users | 799 ReviewsComment On Based On Books The Double Helix
"For a long time, the world believed that Rosalind Franklin had nothing to do with James Watsons and Francis Cricks discovery of DNAs structure. In no small part, thats because Watson said she didnt, and we believed him. His 1968 autobiography Double Helix was the first full-length account of the discovery story. He refers to Franklin as Rosy throughout the book, and describes her physical appearance in blatantly sexist ways. He also omits the part of the story in which he and Crick usedJames D. Watson became a controversial figure later in life, but this story recounts the seminal event in his life: the 1953 discovery of the structure of DNA for which he received the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology with his collaborator Francis Crick and another, Maurice Wilkins. Watson is an excellent storyteller, something which cannot be said of most scientists. He successfully ensnares the reader into the drama of the moment, describing the personalities involved and making the science
Watson is one of those figures who's opinion of himself is so high, you can't help but be dissuaded from feeling the respect you would have been willing to give him merely on the basis of his accomplishments. Reading this book was full of cringe-worthy moments of self-aggrandizement, and times when his accounts of trying to pick up French girls at parties and things of that nature were just unwanted. Written in the late sixties about events that happened in the early fifties, I shouldn't be
Glad I finally read this classic. It's a quick-reading sketch, two or three hours, a half day at most if you need a break. Watson's prose is obscurely ironic at times, which keeps the reader on his toes (or bores him as the case may be) along with quite a bit of humor if you are looking for it. The science, not difficult even at its original full strength, is hardly toned-down for the popular reader, which is a disctinct positive. Watson avoids confusion by simply skipping a few topics, like the
I had to read this book for a science class in college. I've never forgiven that teacher.
I was expecting a lot from this book and it surely didn't meet my expectations. I picked this book because genetics always have been fascinating to me. When I was in college I did a course on molecular biology and DNA was really interesting and important topic. My professor mentioned this book but I couldn't find time to read it that time. Everything is wrong with this book from Watson's writing to his remarks on Rosalind Franklin. The only thing accurate here is the science which can't be
The molecular structure of DNA was determined in 1953 by James Watson and Francis Crick. That was probably the most influential discovery in all of biology and chemistry during that century. This book was written by Watson (comparatively younger and inexperienced compared to Crick, at the time) about how they did it. In great detail, he explains how they did it by essentially using Rosalind Franklin's data without her permission, how the more notorius Linus Pauling nearly beat them to it, and
0 Comments